Competency of Proof of "Customary" Negligence in Support of Charge of Specific Act of Negligence

Falknor, Judson F.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 12

First Page: 35

Year: 1937

Bluebook Citation: 12 WASH. L. REV. 35 (1937)

Author: Judson F. Falknor: all 19 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1973Breimon v. General Motors Corp. Wash. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

It is no doubt accurate to say that the bar of this state has heretofore assumed (and justifiably so, in view of prior decisions of the court) that, generally speaking, a specific charge of negligence (e.g. excessive speed) may not be established by proof of prior or similar acts of negligence, nor even by proof of customary or habitual negligence of the same sort. Consequently, the opinion of the Washington Supreme Court in Sheddy v. Inland Motor Freight, is of more than passing interest.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.