Common Law Duty in Negligence Law: The Recent Consolidation of a Consensus on the Expansion of the Analysis of Duty and the New Conservation Liability Limiting Use of Policy Considerations

Lake, Peter F.

Journal: San Diego Law Review

Volume: 34

First Page: 1503

Year: 1997

Bluebook Citation: 34 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 1503 (1997)

Author: Peter F. Lake: all 8 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2025Rachel Dodson v. Richard Paul Kleffman and Hunter Scott Kleffman, etc. Va. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Without the concept of duty, there is no liability law. Yet, the author demonstrates that although law reviews and other literature contain ample discussion of the legal duty in its various applications, little has been settled with regard the general concept of duty until recently. Professor Lake offers his own account of the concept of duty and offers a 50-state analysis of the general concept of duty, including key decisions that discuss the general concept of duty in negligence law. This article calls upon the American Law Institute to revise the topic of duty to reflect the consensus about its meaning in negligence law now forming among American courts.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.