Comment on Steven Lubet, Reconstructing Atticus Finch

Atkinson, Rob

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 97

First Page: 1370

Year: 1999

Bluebook Citation: 97 MICH. L. REV. 1370 (1999)

Author: Rob Atkinson: all 16 publications


Abstract

Professor Lubet has joined a growing list of revisionists who question Atticus's standing as the paragon of lawyerly virtue.1 But Professor Lubet takes revisionism in a distinctly postmodern direction, if not to a radically new level. Atticus's previous critics have wondered how he could have overlooked, perhaps even condoned, the pervasive racism, sexism, and classism of the Depression-era South. They have even occasionally censured his paternalism toward his pro bono client, the working-class black rape defendant Tom Robinson. But they have never questioned either Tom's claim of innocence or the propriety of Atticus's advocacy of that claim.

Professor Lubet questions both.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.