Claim and Issue Preclusion in Civil Litigation in Washington
Trautman, Philip A.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
★Highly CitedTop 6% most-cited · cited by 46 decisions
46
Citing decisions
5
Courts citing
Citations by decade
7
14
16
6
3
1980s1990s2000s2010s2020s
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by10
- 2024Snap Mobile, Inc., App/x-resp V. Michael Argyrou, Resps/x-apps Wash. Ct. App.
- 2023Snap Mobile, Inc., App/x-resp V. Michael Argyrou, Resps/x-apps Wash. Ct. App.
- 2020Krystal v. Haynie Bankr. D. Idaho
- 2019SVN Cornerstone, LLC v. N. 807 Inc. Wash. App. Ct.
- 2017Fortson-Kemmerer v. Allstate Insurance Co. Wash. Ct. App.
- 2013Berschauer Phillips Construction Co. v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Wash. Ct. App.
- 2013Brownfield v. City of Yakima Wash. Ct. App.
- 2011Olympic Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Department of Revenue Wash. Ct. App.
- 2011Marshall v. Thurston County Wash. Ct. App.
- 2009Green v. City of Wenatchee Wash. Ct. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
The preclusive effect of a judgment is an age-old topic. Why then add more to the existing commentary? Principally, it is because within recent years there have been noteworthy cases and significant developments in the governing principles. The purposes of this article are to recall the orthodoxy of the subject, to note the changes that have been occurring, and to suggest what may be forthcoming.