Civil RICO Reform: The Gatekeeper Concept

Goldsmith, Michael & Linderman, Mark J.

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 43

First Page: 735

Year: 1990

Bluebook Citation: 43 VAND. L. REV. 735 (1990)

Author: Michael Goldsmith: all 13 publications


Abstract

Since coming into vogue in the mid-1980s, civil RICO has often been criticized and targeted for reform. Critics claim that civil RICO is too broad because it potentially applies to all commercial transactions.More specifically, opponents claim that RICO's inclusion of mail and wire fraud as predicate acts unjustly subjects all "legitimate businesses" to liability.For example, Representative Rick Boucher, sponsor of the 1989 RICO reform legislation, has stated: "Fraud allegations are commonly made in contract situations, and all that is needed to convert a simple contract dispute into a civil RICO case is the allegation that there was a contract and the additional allegation that either the mails or the telephones were used more than once in either forming or breaching the contract." Such criticism has led to numerous attempts by courts and legislators to curtail civil RICO. For the most part, these efforts have sought to emasculate civil RICO rather than to rectify isolated problems of abuse or over breadth.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.