California Supreme Court Initiative Reviews, 2000–2010

Uelman, Gerald F.

Journal: Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

Volume: 44

First Page: 659

Year: 2011

Bluebook Citation: 44 LOY. L. A. L. REV. 659 (2011)

Author: Gerald F. Uelman: all 3 publications


Abstract

The single-subject rule has been part of the California Constitution since 1948. However, the California Supreme Court had never declared that an initiative violated this requirement until Senate of California v. Jones in 1999. This ruling seemed to suggest that the court would control the ambitions of the fourth branch of government—initiative drafters. Since Jones, the California Supreme Court, in six different cases, has examined initiatives for compliance with the single-subject rule and the prohibition on constitutional revisions.

By reviewing all six of these cases, this Article explains that the original hope of Jones's impact on initiatives was a mere fantasy because the single-subject rule and prohibition on constitutional revisions have again been reduced to historical artifacts.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.