Brady v. Maryland, Attorney Discipline, and Materiality: Failed Investigations, Long-Chain Evidence, and Beyond

Crump, David

Journal: Hofstra Law Review

Volume: 45

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 45 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2016)

Author: David Crump: all 38 publications


Abstract

The article discusses the legal concept known as the Brady doctrine, derived from the U.S. Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, particularly the requirement of materiality on the part of the government. It examines Rule 3.8(e) of the "D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct," examples of the Brady doctrine, and related cases such as Smith v. Cain, Connick v. Thompson, and In re Kline.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.