Boycotts and Restrictive Marketing Arrangements

Buxbaum, Richard M.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 64

First Page: 671

Year: 1966

Bluebook Citation: 64 MICH. L. REV. 671 (1966)

Author: Richard M. Buxbaum: all 33 publications


Abstract

It is currently a common if still relatively unheralded practice for a "fired" dealer to bring an antitrust action against his former manufacturer-supplier (and perhaps other dealers), alleging that his termination was the result of a boycott. Boycotts-collective efforts to obtain the exclusion of a party from a market-are illegal per se under section 1 of the Sherman Act. Thus, questions concerning the justification for the boycott or the significance of the offender's market position do not arise.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.