BOUNDARIES BY AGREEMENT AND ACQUIESCENCE

Street, Harold M.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 39

First Page: 614

Year: 1941

Bluebook Citation: 39 MICH. L. REV. 614 (1941)

Author: Harold M. Street: all 10 publications


Abstract

An accurate summation of the present-day status of the doctrines of boundaries by agreement and acquiescence is contained in the, following statement made by an eminent text writer: "There are, in this country, a great number of decisions bearing upon the effect of an agreement by adjoining owners as to the boundary line between their lands, or of their recognition of a certain line as the boundary without any express agreement in relation thereto. These decisions are frequently most unsatisfactory in their discussion of the principles involved, and, purporting, as they variously do, to be based on principles of agreement, 'acquiescence,' 'practical location,' estoppel, or the statute of limitations, it is impossible to deduce from them· any generally accepted rules upon the subject."

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.