Bootstraps and Capital Gain--A Participant's View of <em>Commissioner v. Clay Brown</em>

Kinsey, William H.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 64

First Page: 581

Year: 1966

Bluebook Citation: 64 MICH. L. REV. 581 (1966)

Author: William H. Kinsey: all 4 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1969University Hill Foundation v. Commissioner T.C.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

A closely held corporation may be sold in a variety of ways. At one end of the spectrum is an all-cash sale. In such a transaction, the seller receives the purchase price and has no further concern with the economic well-being of the business. The difficulty with this method, of course, is finding a purchaser with sufficient cash who is willing to pay a fair price.

At the other end of the spectrum is a full-fledged bootstrap sale, where there is no down payment other than from the underlying assets of the sold corporation, and the purchaser's obligation to pay the purchase price over a period of years is dependent upon income generated by the underlying corporate assets and upon the assets themselves. Because of this dependency, a bootstrap seller remains vitally interested in the economic well-being of the corporation until the purchase price is fully paid. Between these two extremes are sales where some down payment is made from independent sources, and the purchaser assumes personal liability for all or a portion of the purchase price. The significance of the· purchaser's assumption of personal liability naturally depends upon his financial affluence.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.