Bills and Notes - Holders in Due Course - Payment to an Impostor

Erickson, Thomas S.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 54

First Page: 996

Year: 1956

Bluebook Citation: 54 MICH. L. REV. 996 (1956)

Author: Thomas S. Erickson: all 3 publications


Abstract

Drawer bank drew a check on the plaintiff bank payable to a depositor on the faith of a withdrawal order purportedly signed by the depositor but actually forged by an impostor. The impostor forged the indorsement and cashed the check at defendant bank which received payment from plaintiff-drawee bank. Two years later, upon the death of the impostor, the fraud was discovered. Plaintiff-drawee bank voluntarily reinstated the drawer bank's account and, standing in the drawer's shoes, it won a judgment to have its account with the defendant reinstated.

On appeal, held, reversed. The policy in favor of the free circulation of commercial paper is sufficient basis in the ordinary case for placing the loss on the drawer as the first victim of the impostor's swindle. The majority rule that the impostor's indorsement in the payee's name passes title to a holder in due course is adopted without subscribing to all of the reasons advanced in its favor. Dartmouth National Bank of Hanover v. Keene National Bank, 99 N.H. 458, 115 A. (2d) 316 (1955).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.