BILLS AND NOTES - CONSIDERATION - BURDEN OF PROOF WHEN HOLDER NOT A HOLDER IN DUE COURSE

Meisenholder, Robert

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 37

First Page: 950

Year: 1939

Bluebook Citation: 37 MICH. L. REV. 950 (1939)

Author: Robert Meisenholder: all 20 publications


Abstract

Plaintiff, a maid and housekeeper for the decedent, sued the decedent's estate as payee of two checks signed by the decedent and dishonored by the drawee bank. In support of the defense of lack of consideration, the estate introduced evidence that plaintiff had been paid by the estate for her services to the decedent, and that plaintiff's daughter had told the bank's cashier that the checks had been given to her mother by decedent to be cashed when it became certain that decedent would not live. There was no other evidence. Held, the trial court properly directed a verdict for plaintiff; the defendant did not overcome the presumption that the check was given for a consideration.

In re Hubbard's Estate, 286 Mich. 444,282 N. W. 209 (1938).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.