Beyond "Guilty" or "Not Guilty": Giving Special Verdicts in Criminal Jury Trials

Kate Nepveu

Journal: Yale Law & Policy Review

Volume: 21

First Page: 263

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 21 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 263 (2003)

Author: Kate Nepveu: all 2 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2006State v. Blackwell N.C.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

"Special verdicts are generally disfavored in criminal trials." This statement appears so often in judicial discussions of jury verdicts, it is nearly a platitude. The reason for the disfavor is quite simple: A true special verdict is one where the jury does not render a general verdict of guilty or not guilty, but simply finds certain facts and leaves the rest to the court. True special verdicts are almost never used in criminal cases, because by taking away the jury's power to render a verdict, they violate the Sixth Amendment "right to have a jury make the ultimate determination of guilt" -leading directly to the sentiment behind the opening quotation.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.