Authentication and the Best and Secondary Evidence Rules

Mendez, Miguel A

Journal: University of San Francisco Law Review

Volume: 41

Year: 2006

Bluebook Citation: 41 U. S. F. L. REV. (2006)

Author: Miguel A. Mendez: all 16 publications


Abstract

This article examines the requirements to introduce writings into evidence: authentication, the best and secondary evidence rules, and the completeness doctrine. It also highlights the differences between the California rules and federal rules as they relate to authentication of writings.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.