Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking

Coglianese, Cary

Journal: Duke Law Journal

Volume: 46

First Page: 1255

Year: 1997

Bluebook Citation: 46 DUKE L.J. 1255 (1997)

Author: Cary Coglianese: all 21 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
2000s2010s

Courts citing this journal article

D.D.C.1
Fed. Cl.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2017Public Housing Authorities Directors Ass'n v. United States Fed. Cl.
  • 2004Center for Law & Education v. United States Department of Education D.D.C.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Negotiated rulemaking appears by most accounts to have come of age. A procedure that once seemed confined to discussion among administrative law scholars has in the past decade captured the attention of policymakers throughout the nation's capital. Congress officially endorsed regulatory negotiation in the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990, and it permanently reauthorized the Act in 1996. Over the past few years, the executive branch has visibly supported regulatory negotiation, both through the Clinton administration's National Performance Review (NPR) and through specific presidential directives to agency heads.

Congress has also begun to mandate the use of negotiated rulemaking by certain agencies in the development of specific regulations. As a result of these and other efforts, federal agencies have begun to employ the consensus-based process known as negotiated rulemaking.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.