Arms for Their Defence - An Historical, Legal and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. City of Chicago

Charles, Patrick J.

Journal: Cleveland State Law Review

Volume: 57

First Page: 351

Year: 2009

Bluebook Citation: 57 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 351 (2009)

Author: Patrick J. Charles: all 19 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Courts citing this journal article

4th Cir.1
S.D.W. Va.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2012United States v. Carpio-Leon 4th Cir.
  • 2010United States v. Tooley S.D.W. Va.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Article analyzes the arguments Individual Rights Scholars have made concerning the right to have arms and their influence on Supreme Court decisions regarding gun control. The author compares these arguments with historical English gun control laws to show that there is a misunderstanding between the idea that gun ownership rights have always been protected by government.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.