Applying Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to Single-Member Offices

Sebold, Edward J.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 88

First Page: 2199

Year: 1990

Bluebook Citation: 88 MICH. L. REV. 2199 (1990)

Author: Edward J. Sebold: all 3 publications


Abstract

This Note questions whether an exemption for single-member offices is justified. Part I provides a brief overview of the Voting Rights Act and the types of discrimination in the political process to which it applies., Part I then reviews the decisions on single-member offices, including the courts' attempts to define single-member offices. This Part concludes neither Congress nor the Supreme Court dictates an exemption for single-member offices. Instead, single-member offices should be open to challenge if they hamper the achievement of section 2's goals.

Part II identifies the goals of section 2 by developing a number of theories to give meaning to the opportunity to participate and elect language of section 2. This Part concludes the goal of section 2 is to bolster civic inclusion in the political process by eliminating the lingering effects of race discrimination. Part III then tests the exemption for single-member offices against the goal of section 2. This Note concludes that the exemption actually thwarts section 2's goal and, therefore, single-member offices should be open to challenge under section 2.

Finally, Part IV develops guidelines for applying section 2 to single-member offices.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.