Appellate Capacity and Caseload Growth

Marvell, Thomas B.

Journal: Akron Law Review

Volume: 16

Year: 1983

Bluebook Citation: 16 AKRON L. REV. (1983)

Author: Thomas B. Marvell: all 8 publications


Abstract

This article has two purposes. The first is to show that, indeed, the three categories of responses to caseload growth are the only feasible responses. This article argues that case-management techniques, another popular response, is of little or no use in reducing the substantial backlogs that result from the caseload growth. Instead of focusing on case management techniques one should focus on the judges - their number and their productivity - as sources of appellate court delay.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.