APPEAL AND ERROR-RIGHT OF DEFENDANT TO NEW TRIAL WHERE PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO ALL OR NONE AND VERDICT IS INTERMEDIATE

Moore S.Ed., Bruce L.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 46

First Page: 1105

Year: 1948

Bluebook Citation: 46 MICH. L. REV. 1105 (1948)

Author: Bruce L. Moore S Ed: all 6 publications


Abstract

In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent commission on the sale of real estate. Defendant denied the validity of the contract, and there was no issue as to the amount of liability if liability existed. The instruction to the jury was that plaintiff was entitled to 5 per cent commission if entitled to recover. The jury returned a verdict for $875, half the amount claimed.

Defendant's motion for a new trial was denied. Held, although the verdict was unauthorized as to plaintiff, there was no error as to defendant and he cannot complain of the jury's failure to award plaintiff the full amount to which he was entitled. Johns v. League, Duvall & Powell, (Ga. 1947) 45 S.E. (2d) 211.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.