APPEAL AND ERROR - REVIEWABILITY OF AN ORDER GRANTING A NEW TRIAL

Warren, Robert M.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 38

First Page: 208

Year: 1939

Bluebook Citation: 38 MICH. L. REV. 208 (1939)

Author: Robert M. Warren: all 9 publications


Abstract

When a trial court sets aside a verdict and grants a new trial, the order may or may not be reviewable depending on the jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions which permit a review, the aggrieved party must save an exception to the order and assign this ruling as error when an appeal is ultimately taken from a subsequent appealable decision. In other jurisdictions, he may take an appeal directly from the order. This comment will discuss (1) the common-law practice which permitted no review of an order granting a new trial; (2) the practice allowing the aggrieved party to save an exception to the order and assign it as error on a subsequent appeal; (3) the procedure of direct appeal; and (4) the desirability of allowing a direct appeal.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.