Antitrust and Its Critics

Adams, Walter

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 46

First Page: 585

Year: 1967

Bluebook Citation: 46 NEB. L. REV. 585 (1967)

Author: W. Michael Adams: all 25 publications


Abstract

Antitrust strategy policy proposals share one common characteristic: they reveal a profound misconception of the rationale of antitrust and the role of competition as a regulatory device in a free economy. To explore the nature of this misconception is the purpose of the following article. I. "The Antitrust Laws Should Attack Monopoly, Not Conspiracy" II. "Antitrust Should Attack Bad Monopolies, Not All Monopolies" III. Antitrust Should Attack Conspiracies, Not Mergers and Concentration IV. Antitrust Should Be Abandoned Altogether because Conspiracy and Monopoly Are Creatures of the State. In the Absence of Government Interference, Trade Restraints Would Not and Could Not Exist V. Conclusion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.