Anti-Formalism in Recent Constitutional Theory

Tushnet, Mark V.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 83

First Page: 1502

Year: 1985

Bluebook Citation: 83 MICH. L. REV. 1502 (1985)

Author: Mark V. Tushnet: all 162 publications


Abstract

The focus in constitutional theory on judicial review rests on a much deeper political theory than the phrase "countermajoritarian difficulty" standing alone suggests. Majoritarian or democratic decision making is itself a solution to a set of problems that arise from a particular view of human nature and political action. In this Article, I identify, explicate, and criticize some recent developments in constitutional theory which are of interest to the extent that they reject that view of human nature and politics. I take as my focus important articles by Robert Burt, Robert Cover, Owen Fiss, Frank Michelman, and Cass Sunstein.

I argue that the line of thought expressed by these authors attempts to displace concern with the countermajoritarian difficulty rather than to allay such concern.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.