An Appellate Court Dilemma and a Solution Through Subject Matter Organization

Meador, Daniel J.

Journal: University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

Volume: 16

First Page: 471

Year: 1983

Bluebook Citation: 16 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 471 (1983)

Author: Daniel J. Meador: all 27 publications


Abstract

The recent litigation explosion presents a two-pronged dilemma for American appellate courts. If, on the one hand, the number of appellate judges is not expanded to keep abreast of growing case loads, there is a risk that courts will rely too heavily on professional staff, thereby watering down the decision-making process. If, on the other hand, the number of judges is proportionately increased with the growth in appellate litigation, the number of three-judge decisional units will also increase, thereby threatening predictability and uniformity in the law of the jurisdiction. This Article undertakes to explain that dilemma and to offer a solution for it.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.