An Analysis of Two Federal Structures: The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution

Smith, Douglas G.

Journal: San Diego Law Review

Volume: 34

First Page: 249

Year: 1997

Bluebook Citation: 34 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 249 (1997)

Author: D. Gordon Smith: all 29 publications


Abstract

This Article compares the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution to gain insight into both the Constitution and the contemporary federalism debate. The author employs textual analysis to the documents underlying both federal structures and discusses other models of political union which influenced the framers. The author concludes that the fundamental difference between the Articles and the Constitution is that the latter represented a compact among both the people and the states, whereas the former represented a compact among states alone. This theory is used to shed light on topics such as the constitutionality of secession, Constitutional amendment outside the scope of Article V, and the interpretation of enumerated powers.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.