All Things in Proportion? American Rights Review and the Problem of Balancing

Mathews, Jud & Sweet, Alec Stone

Journal: Emory Law Journal

Volume: 60

First Page: 797

Year: 2010

Bluebook Citation: 60 EMORY L.J. 797 (2010)

Author: Alec Stone Sweet: all 4 publications


Abstract

This Article describes and evaluates the evolution of rights doctrine in the United States, focusing on the problem of balancing. In the current Supreme Court, deep conflict over whether, when, and how courts balance rights is omnipresent. Elsewhere, we find that the world¿s most powerful constitutional courts have embraced a stable analytical procedure for balancing, known as proportionality. Today, proportionality analysis (PA) constitutes the defining doctrinal core of a transnational, rights-based constitutionalism.

This Article critically examines alleged American exceptionalism, from the standpoint of comparative constitutional law and practice.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.