Agencies Interpreting Courts Interpreting Statutes: The Deference Conundrum of a Divided Supreme Court

Craig, Robin Kundis

Journal: Emory Law Journal

Volume: 61

Year: 2011

Bluebook Citation: 61 EMORY L.J. (2011)

Author: Robin Kundis Craig: all 31 publications


Abstract

Plurality decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court demand interpretation, especially because they tend to occur when the Court faces important but divisive legal issues. Most courts, agencies, and scholars have assumed that federal agencies are in no better position to interpret plurality decisions than the lower federal courts when confronted with a potentially precedential Supreme Court plurality decision--the agency must construe the Justices--various opinions in search of a controlling rationale.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.