Affecting Eternity: The Court's Confused Lesson in Board of Education v. Earls

Dery III, George M.

Journal: William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Volume: 11

First Page: 1155

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 11 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 1155 (2003)

Author: George M. Dery Iii: all 21 publications


Abstract

In Board of Education v. Earls, the US. Supreme Court found the random drug testing of schoolchildren who participated in extracurricular activities to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. In this Article, Professor Dery argues that this latest extension of the special needs doctrine is both patronizing to student privacy interests and inconsistent with the Court's previous limitation of suspicionless searches in New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Chandler v. Miller. Professor Dery criticizes the Court's Earls decision as a confused lesson in constitutional law, abandoning the very fundamentals of the Fourth Amendment.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.