“Advice and Consent” In the Appointments Clause: From Another Historical Perspective

Friedland, Steven I.

Journal: Duke Law Journal

Volume: 64

First Page: 173

Year: 2015

Bluebook Citation: 64 DUKE L.J. 173 (2015)

Author: Steven I. Friedland: all 23 publications


Abstract

This Essay, a response to Russell L. Weaver's symposium contribution, "Advice and Consent" in Historical Perspective, first explores the Appointments Clause’s antecedents in the Age of Enlightenment and its emergence in the Constitutional Convention in 1787, showing how its sturdy separation-of-powers foundation was built. In Part II, the Essay focuses on the historical realities of the Clause’s two-branch process, especially how the operability of two political bodies naturally yields results consonant with the etiquette and political sensibilities of the day. Then, in Part III, it offers several suggestions on how to cabin the potentially untrammeled discretion of the Senate in responding to presidential nominations.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.