Advancements: II

Elbert, Harold I.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 52

First Page: 231

Year: 1953

Bluebook Citation: 52 MICH. L. REV. 231 (1953)

Author: Harold I. Elbert: all 5 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1961Barron v. Janney Md.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

A voluntary inter vivos transfer by a parent to a child is not an advancement so long as the transferor lives. The purpose of the doctrine is to equalize an intestate' s property among his children. It is auxiliary to the distribution of his estate that the question of advancement is raised. The death of the transferor is not enough to give rise to the doctrine.

The person seeking to charge the intestate's heirs with an advancement must prove several additional facts. The legislation of each state determines what must be proved in order to charge the transferee with an advancement.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.