ADR's Place in Foreclosure: Remedying the Flaws of a Securitized Housing Market

Nussbaum, Lydia

Journal: Cardozo Law Review

Volume: 34

First Page: 1889

Year: 2013

Bluebook Citation: 34 CARDOZO L. REV. 1889 (2013)

Author: Lydia Nussbaum: all 6 publications


Abstract

Millions of Americans lost their homes during the foreclosure crisis, an unprecedented disaster still plaguing local and national economies. A primary factor contributing to the crisis has been the failure of conventional foreclosure procedures to account for the new realities of securitization and the secondary mortgage market, which transformed the traditional borrower-lender relationship. To compensate for the shortcomings of conventional foreclosure procedures and stem the tide of residential foreclosure, state and local governments turned to ADR processes for a solution. Some foreclosure ADR programs, however, have greater potential to avoid foreclosures than others.

This Article comprehensively examines the key components of foreclosure ADR programs and presents best practices for governments seeking to utilize ADR as a tool to mitigate the foreclosure crisis and re-energize the economy.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.