Admiralty Procedure and Jurisdiction After the 1966 Unification

Robertson, David W.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 74

First Page: 1627

Year: 1976

Bluebook Citation: 74 MICH. L. REV. 1627 (1976)

Author: David W. Robertson: all 42 publications


Abstract

From the nation's beginning, the federal district courts have been vested with jurisdiction in cases "of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction." Like its predecessor statute, section 1333 of the present Judicial Code asserts that the jurisdiction is "exclusive of the courts of the states," but the infamous "saving clause" goes on to negate that exclusivity in the bulk of maritime cases by giving the plaintiff the option of maintaining his action in any other court having jurisdiction over it. In "saving clause" cases--that is, cases that could have been brought in federal court under the admiralty jurisdiction, but which were maintained, at plaintiff's option, in nonadmiralty tribunals--the substantive federal maritime law continues to obtain, although procedural consequences vary.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.