Administrative Oversight: Justice Gorsuch’s Patent Opinions, the PTAB, and Antagonism Toward the Administrative State

Kim, Daniel D. & Stroud, Jonathan

Journal: Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property

Volume: 18

First Page: 53

Year: 2019

Bluebook Citation: 18 CHI.-KENT J. INTELL. PROP. 53 (2019)

Author: Daniel D. Kim: all 2 publications


Abstract

In his first term, Justice Neil Gorsuch has made a surprisingly forceful impact on, of all things, patent law—and even more unlikely, the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s adjudicatory arm, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Was there any way to predict, from his 10th Circuit opinions below, that he would author opinions in all three patent cases in his first term? Was this attention the result of deeply submerged but long-felt opinions on patent law, or rather a result of his sharp distrust of administrative overreach? We analyze 10th Circuit and Supreme Court opinions authored by Justice Gorsuch, and conclude his unforeseen interest springs from his desire to limit agency power rather than from any particular concern with patents.

Still, his opinions—intentionally or by happenstance—will reverberate through our patent law for years.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.