Abuse in Plaintiff Class Action Settlements: The Need for a Guardian During Pretrial Settlement Negotiations

Lazos, Sylvia R.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 84

First Page: 308

Year: 1985

Bluebook Citation: 84 MICH. L. REV. 308 (1985)

Author: Sylvia R. Lazos: all 3 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
2000s2010s

Courts citing this journal article

D. Mass.1
Tex. App.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2015Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc. D. Mass.
  • 2001Michael Northrup and Homer Max Wiesen v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Tex. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Note explores the problem of abuse of the class action device during the pretrial settlement process. Part I analyzes the underlying sources of potential abuse in pretrial settlement negotiations. Part II assesses the adequacy of the standards currently used by courts to detect collusive class action settlements. Part III concludes that the appointment of a neutral third-party guardian to oversee the pretrial negotiation process furthers the judicial policy of encouraging settlements while protecting the interests of the absentee class.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.