A Three-Dimensional Approach to the Public-Private Distinction

Schoenhard, Paul M.

Journal: Utah Law Review

Volume: 2008

Year: 2008

Bluebook Citation: 2008 UTAH L. REV. (2008)

Author: Paul M. Schoenhard: all 3 publications


Abstract

Once thought to be dead but ruling us from the grave, the public-private distinction remains alive and necessary to adjudication of fundamental constitutional issues as well as issues in, among other areas, corporations and securities law. Unfortunately, the traditional, two-dimensional approaches to public and private result in inconsistencies and, more often than not, are simply chosen for their abilities to dictate a desired result in any given case. By looking instead to the question "Is X public as to Y?" the new framework proposed here enables a thrC?e-dimensional approach to public-private issues. By assessing the relationship between X and Y, the framework categorizes those relationships into: (I) those as a matter of right, (2) those as a matter of privilege, or (3) no relationship-the first two categories defining a "public."

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.