A Tale of Two <i>Greenmoss Builders</i>

O'Neil, Robert M.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 88

First Page: 125

Year: 2013

Bluebook Citation: 88 WASH. L. REV. 125 (2013)

Author: Robert M. M. O'Neil: all 43 publications


Abstract

If ever a pending Supreme Court case deserved the merciful disposition of “improvidently granted,” it would seem to be Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. Many factors seem to warrant such interment for an elusive and wholly unsatisfying controversy. Arguably, by any objective standard, this case should never have gone beyond a routine and little noted denial of certioriari. Against this unhappy background, let me offer several countervailing and compelling factors that seem to warrant an alternative disposition.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.