A Study of Juvenile Waiver
Ferguson, A. Bruce & Douglas, Alan Charles
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by3
- 1988In re Manuel R. Conn.
- 1985State v. Benoit N.H.
- 1983Commonwealth v. A Juvenile Mass.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
In a footnote to its recent decision, In re Dennis M, the California Supreme Court recommended, that "juvenile officers and police be prepared to give their compulsory Miranda warning in terms that reflect the language and experience of today’s juveniles." This language stimulated our attempt to draft and test the efficacy of a simplified Miranda warning, potentially more understandable to juveniles, and consistent with juvenile law requirements. The purpose of this article is to relate the findings of an empirical study which sought to answer two questions: 1) should the Miranda warning be revised for the juvenile offender; and 2) does a minor have the capacity knowingly and intelligently to waive his Miranda rights?