A Randomized Experiment Assessing the Accuracy of Microsoft's "Bing It On" Challenge

Ayres, Ian, Atiq, Emad, Li, Sheng, Lu, Michelle, Maher, Tom & Tsang, Christine

Journal: Loyola Consumer Law Review

Volume: 26

First Page: 1

Year: 2013

Bluebook Citation: 26 LOY. CONSUMER L. REV. 1 (2013)

Author: Sheng Li: all 3 publications


Abstract

Abstract: In advertisements associated with its “Bing It On” campaign, Microsoft claimed that “people preferred Bing web search results nearly 2:1 over Google in blind comparison tests.” We tested Microsoft’s claims by way of a randomized experiment involving U.S.-based Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (“MTurk”) subjects and conducted on Microsoft’s own www.bingiton.com website. We found that (i) a statisticallysignificant majority of participants preferred Google search results to Bing search results (53% to 41%); and (ii) participants were significantly less likely to prefer Bing results when randomly assigned to use popular search terms or self-selected

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.