A Hill to Die On: Federal Court Reform in the 2020s

Suitor, Daniel P.

Journal: Minnesota Law Review Vols. 106:2 onward (2021-present)

Volume: 106

First Page: 2591

Year: 2022

Bluebook Citation: 106 2591

Author: Daniel P. Suitor: all 3 publications


Abstract

Is the Federal Judiciary broken and, if so, what can we do to fix it? To that end, Minnesota Law Review hosted its annual Symposium on March 25, 2022. Titled “A Hill to Die On: Federal Court Reform in the 2020s,” the event gathered some of the country’s leading thinkers, writers, and broadcasters studying the structure and operation of the Article III courts. Across three wide-ranging discussions, the Symposium’s participants attempted to answer the overarching inquiries by investigating the Supreme Court, lower federal courts, and the current events surrounding them.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.