A Curious Parental Right

Ryznar, Margaret

Journal: SMU Law Review

Volume: 71

First Page: 127

Year: 2018

Bluebook Citation: 71 SMU L. REV. 127 (2018)

Author: Margaret Ryznar: all 30 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
2010s2020s

Courts citing this journal article

Ariz. App. Ct.1
Okla.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2023SCOTT v. FOSTER Okla.
  • 2018Trisha A. v. Dep't of Child Safety, L.A. Ariz. App. Ct.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The United States Supreme Court has not articulated the appropriate level of scrutiny for judicial review of interferences with the parents’ care, custody, and control of their children, despite determining it to be constitutionally fundamental. While some observers have called for the selection of a level of scrutiny to prevent inconsistencies among the lower courts, the complexity of the parental right has made it difficult for courts to use one level of scrutiny in such cases. To accommodate this complexity, this Article begins to build a new framework for conceptualizing the parental right in a way that explains and justifies using more than one level of scrutiny in a consistent and predictable way, depending on the specific parental issue at stake.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.