A Cure for Every Ill? Remedies for “Pathological” Arbitration Clauses

Samra, Harout J. & Ramachanderan, Ramya

Journal: University of Miami Law Review

Volume: 74

First Page: 1110

Year: 2020

Bluebook Citation: 74 U. MIAMI L. REV. 1110 (2020)

Author: Harout Jack Samra: all 4 publications


Abstract

Defective arbitration and dispute resolution clauses—widely called “pathological clauses”—may undermine parties’ intent to seek recourse to arbitration rather than the courts. Questions concerning the existence and validity of arbitration clauses are subject to state contract law despite the wide sweep of the Federal Arbitration Act. This Article examines selected common “pathologies” and reviews recent court decisions, including from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and its constituent federal district courts, concerning the enforcement of such clauses.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.