A Century of Tort Immunities in Virginia

Eichner, James A.

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 4

First Page: 238

Year: 1970

Bluebook Citation: 4 U. RICH. L. REV. 238 (1970)

Author: James A. Eichner: all 3 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2025Monica Drasovean v. Steven Walts Va. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Since the earliest days of tort litigation, the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, like the courts of its sister states, has been committed to the general view that legal responsibility follows negligence, and that the master is liable for his servants' torts committed within the scope of their employment. However, several years before the found- ing of the T. C. Williams School of Law, the Virginia court, in its landmark decision respecting governmental tort immunity, laid down a decision which has led to the creation of a number of tort immunities which it has never sought to justify on grounds of logic, which have not been demonstrated as compelled by precedent, and which have been weakly defended, if at all, on grounds of public policy.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.