A Case for Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Class III Medical Device Trials

Megan Wright

Journal: Yale Law & Policy Review

Volume: 34

Year: 2016

Bluebook Citation: 34 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. (2016)

Author: Megan S. Wright: all 10 publications


Abstract

In this paper, I evaluate the ethical implications of the FDA’s move to en-courage randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trials for Class III devices when such studies are possible. In Part I, I describe the placebo effect and how researchers control for it. In Part II, I describe the results of studies of medical procedures and devices that have used a sham control. In Part III, I de-scribe the ethical concerns surrounding the use of sham surgeries to study medical devices.

In Part IV, I argue for the use of randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled device trials, and propose an ethical framework for these studies.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.