A Bank Customer Has No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy of Bank Records: United States v. Miller
Pray, Francis X.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by3
- 1993State v. Schultz Kan.
- 1983People v. Jackson Ill. App. Ct.
- 1980Charnes v. Digiacomo Colo.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
Recent federal legislation accords privacy protection to individuals concerning information held and compiled by third parties. States have also recognized the need to protect a person's privacy interest in information no longer in his exclusive control or possession. This legislation, however, is aimed only at limited kinds of privacy problems. It does not represent a comprehensive solution to the modern privacy dilemma: Does an individual have a legitimate privacy claim to information held by third parties?
A critical advantage in analyzing the Miller decision is derived from tracing the development of privacy rights. Such a background may be used as a reference to determine whether Miller represents an enduring and positive contribution to the law of privacy.