WYOMING COURT RULES

126 the applicable criteria that must be considered and applied by a court when considering a motion from a surety to set aside forfeiture of a bond. Action Bailbonds v. State, 49 P.3d 1002, 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 109 (Wyo. 2002). Where the district court focused on defen- dant’s previous failure to appear, the resulting inconvenience to the court and other partici- pants in having to reset defendant’s probation revocation hearing, and the surety’s awareness of the high bond amount, the district court did not address the factors relevant under case law to determining a motion to set aside a forfei- ture, and no adequate bases existed for appel- late review of the district court’s order of partial bond forfeiture, thereby necessitating a remand for development of the record. Northwest Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State (In re Northwest Bail Bonds, Inc.), 2002 WY 102, 50 P.3d 313, 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 108 (Wyo. 2002). Remission appropriate. — District court did not abuse its discretion by ordering the remission of 50 percent of forfeited bail bonds