92 established by the Remote Deposition Vendor prior to the deposition and controlled by the Remote Deposition Vendor. (i) Any pauses, lags, and/or disruptions in technology, including but not limited to interruptions in internet connection, will not result in waiver of objections by any party. If a technical issue prevents any person from being able to see or hear one or more of the other persons clearly or to access published exhibits, the person encountering such technical issue shall promptly notify the other participants. (j) Nothing in this Rule prevents a party from moving for a protective order under W.R.C.P. 26(c) to request a given deposition proceed in person. (k) Nothing contained in this Rule precludes counsel for a witness from being in the same room as the witness. (l) Any Protective Order entered in the action shall apply to any confi- dential testimony and/or documents used as exhibits during the taking of any Remote Deposition to the same extent it would to an in-person deposition. (m) The parties may agree on ad hoc modifications to this procedure in order to accommodate the needs of a particular witness and/or to resolve any issues that may arise with respect to a particular deposition. Such modifi- cations may be stipulated to in writing or memorialized on the record at a deposition. (n) If there are issues with connectivity with a Deposition Participant, or if these Remote Deposition Protocols cannot be resolved consensually, subject to the court’s availability, the parties may seek an expedited telephonic hearing with the court. History: Adopted July 9, 2024, effective October 1, 2024.
Chat with this court rule using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.