WYOMING COURT RULES

124 Hosp., 2001 WY 32, 20 P.3d 508, 2001 Wyo. LEXIS 42 (Wyo. 2001), reh’g denied, 2001 Wyo. LEXIS 48 (Wyo. Apr. 17, 2001). Bifurcation not necessary. — In a guard- ianship proceeding, the trial court did not err by denying the mother’s motion to bifurcate the trial and considering the question of the moth- er’s unfitness and the question of appointment of the grandparents as guardians in one pro- ceeding, because the determination of the mother’s fitness required extensive testimony from the same witnesses who would be re- quired to testify as to the best interests of the children in the appointment of the grandpar- ents as guardians. White v. State ex rel. Wyo. DOT, 2009 WY 90, 210 P.3d 1096, 2009 Wyo. LEXIS 95 (Wyo. 2009). When three married couples and an investor formed a limited liability company (LLC) to operate a ranch, a dispute concerning the man- agement of the LCC led to an action for declara- tory judgment to establish the members’ rights and interests; the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion to bifurcate the proceedings into one trial determining the