Termination of guardianships for noncompliance with no further identification of whether a guardianship remains necessary, and if so, a successor guardian. A. Where the court removes a sole guardian based upon the sole guardian’s noncompliance with his or her duties and responsibilities pursuant to NRS 159.185 -.1857/159A.185-.186, suspends a sole guardian’s authority under NRS 159.1855 (3)/ 159A.1855 (3), or revokes letters of guardianship pursuant to NRS 159.085 (8)/ 159A.085 (8), the court shall not terminate the guardianship pursuant to NRS 159.1905 -.192/159A.1905-.192 without making specific findings as to: 1. The protected person’s current health and welfare; 2. The reasons a guardianship does or does not remain necessary, including identifying the existence of less-restrictive alternatives; and 3. Whether maintaining the guardianship would serve the protected person’s best interests. B. Where the location and circumstances of the protected person are unknown to the court and/or parties of record, prior to terminating a guardianship pursuant to NRS 159.1905 -.192/159A.1905-.192 based upon a guardian’s noncompliance with duties and responsibilities under law, the court shall order an investigation pursuant to NRS 159.046 , 159A.046 , and/or NRS 159.341 to verify the status of the protected person. C. Upon notice, the court may appoint the public guardian as temporary guardian of a protected adult during pendency of proceedings described in subsection A. [Added; effective December 9, 2019.]
Chat with this court rule using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.