New York Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR Part 1200)
Rule: 3.6
Jurisdiction: NY
Bluebook Citation: NY RPC 3.6
(a) A lawyer who is participating in or has participated in a criminal or civil matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter. (b) A statement ordinarily is likely to prejudice materially an adjudicative proceeding when it refers to a civil matter triable to a jury, a criminal matter or any other proceeding that could result in incarceration, and the statement relates to: (1) (2) (3) the character, credibility, reputation or criminal record of a party, suspect in a criminal investigation or witness, or the identity of a witness or the expected testimony of a party or witness; in a criminal matter that could result in incarceration, the possibility of a plea of guilty to the offense or the existence or contents of any confession, admission or statement given by a defendant or suspect, or that person’s refusal or failure to make a statement; the performance or results of any examination or test, or the refusal or failure of a person to submit to an examination or test, or the identity or nature of physical evidence expected to be presented; (4) (5) (6) any opinion as to the guilt or innocence of a defendant or suspect in a criminal matter that could result in incarceration; information the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is likely to be inadmissible as evidence in a trial and would, if disclosed, create a substantial risk of prejudicing an impartial trial; or the fact that a defendant has been charged with a crime, unless there is included therein a statement explaining that the charge is merely an accusation and that the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty. (c) Provided that the statement complies with paragraph (a), a lawyer may state the following without elaboration: (1) the claim, offense or defense and, except when prohibited by identity of the persons involved; law, the (2) information contained in a public record; (3) that an investigation of a matter is in progress; (4) the scheduling or result of any step in litigation; (5) (6) a request for assistance in obtaining evidence and information necessary thereto; a warning of danger concerning the behavior of a person involved, when there is reason to believe that there exists the likelihood of substantial harm to an individual or to the public interest; and (7) in a criminal matter: (i) (ii) the identity, age, residence, occupation and family status of the accused; if the accused has not been apprehended, i n formation necessa ry i n apprehension of that person; t o a id (iii) the identity of investigating and arresting officers or agencies and the length of the investigation; and (iv) the fact, time and place of arrest, resistance, pursuit and use of weapons, and a description of physical evidence seized, in a than as contained only other confession, admission or statement. (d) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a lawyer may make a statement that a reasonable lawyer would believe is required to protect a client from the substantial prejudicial effect of recent publicity not initiated by the lawyer or the lawyer’s client. A statement made pursuant to this paragraph shall be limited to such information as is necessary to mitigate the recent adverse publicity. (e) No lawyer associated in a firm or government agency with a lawyer subject to paragraph (a) shall make a statement prohibited by paragraph (a).
Chat with this court rule using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.