(a) Specialty Court—Defined. A specialty court is a court program that uses therapeutic or problem-solving procedures to address underlying factors that may be contributing to a party’s involvement in the criminal justice system, i.e., mental illness or drug, alcohol, or other addiction. Procedures may include treatment, mandatory periodic testing for a prohibited drug or other substance, community supervision, and appropriate sanctions and incentives. (b) Specialty Court Allowed. A judicial district may establish a specialty court. (c) Receipt of Ex Parte Communication. A judge presiding over a specialty court docket established under subsection (b) may initiate, permit, and consider an ex parte communication with a probation officer, case manager, treatment provider, or other member of a specialty court team, either at a team meeting or in a document provided to all members of the team. (d) Disclosure of Ex Parte Communication. A judge who receives an ex parte communication under subsection (c) may preside over any subsequent proceeding if: (1) the judge discloses to the parties the existence of the communication and, if known, the nature of the communication; and (2) the judge obtains the parties’ consent to the judge’s participation in the proceeding. [ History: New rule adopted effective January 28, 2009; Restyled rule and amended effective July 1, 2012; Am. effective July 5, 2017; Rule 109A renumbered without amendment to Rule 190 effective January 27, 2021.]
Chat with this court rule using AI
Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this court rule, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.