Request to Withdraw Complaint; Settlements

(a) Withdrawal of Complaint . (1) A plaintiff may withdraw the complaint prior to the commencement of the hearing by filing a written notice of withdrawal with the magisterial district court. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district court shall: (i) mark the withdrawal of the complaint on the docket; (ii) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (iii) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been withdrawn. (2) A withdrawal of the complaint filed prior to the commencement of the hearing shall be deemed to be without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a new complaint on the same cause of action upon payment of all applicable fees and costs. (b) Settlements. (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (1) A plaintiff may withdraw the complaint prior to the commencement of the hearing by filing a written notice of withdrawal with the magisterial district court. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district court shall: (i) mark the withdrawal of the complaint on the docket; (ii) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (iii) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been withdrawn. (2) A withdrawal of the complaint filed prior to the commencement of the hearing shall be deemed to be without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a new complaint on the same cause of action upon payment of all applicable fees and costs. (b) Settlements. (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (i) mark the withdrawal of the complaint on the docket; (ii) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (iii) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been withdrawn. (2) A withdrawal of the complaint filed prior to the commencement of the hearing shall be deemed to be without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a new complaint on the same cause of action upon payment of all applicable fees and costs. (b) Settlements. (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (ii) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (iii) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been withdrawn. (2) A withdrawal of the complaint filed prior to the commencement of the hearing shall be deemed to be without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a new complaint on the same cause of action upon payment of all applicable fees and costs. (b) Settlements. (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (iii) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been withdrawn. (2) A withdrawal of the complaint filed prior to the commencement of the hearing shall be deemed to be without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a new complaint on the same cause of action upon payment of all applicable fees and costs. (b) Settlements. (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (2) A withdrawal of the complaint filed prior to the commencement of the hearing shall be deemed to be without prejudice. The plaintiff may file a new complaint on the same cause of action upon payment of all applicable fees and costs. (b) Settlements. (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (b) Settlements. (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (1) Settlement Without Stipulated Judgment. (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (i) Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2), pertaining to stipulated judgments, parties may file a written notice of settlement of the complaint with the magisterial district court at any time prior to the entry of judgment. The notice of settlement shall include the signatures of the parties. Upon receipt of such notice, the magisterial district judge shall: (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (A) mark the settlement of the complaint on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (ii) If the magisterial district court has previously marked the complaint as settled pursuant to subdivision (b)(1)(i) and a subsequent breach of the settlement agreement occurs, a party may file a new complaint citing breach of the settlement agreement as the cause of action. (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (2) Settlement with Stipulated Judgment. (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (i) The parties may file a written notice of a stipulated judgment as part of a settlement agreement at any time prior to the entry of judgment. (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (ii) The notice shall be made on a form promulgated by the State Court Administrator that shall include: (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (A) the amount of the stipulated judgment, which shall include fees but not court costs; (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (B) a notice to the defendant advising that: (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (I) the defendant should review the settlement agreement to ensure familiarity with and acceptance of its terms; (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (II) a judgment will be entered against the defendant on the docket of the magisterial district court; and (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (III) the plaintiff shall have the right to request execution of the judgment if the defendant fails to make payments as agreed; and (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (C) the signatures of the parties. (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (iii) Upon receipt of a notice compliant with the requirements of subdivision (b)(2)(ii), the magisterial district court shall: (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (A) mark the entry of the stipulated judgment on the docket; (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (B) cancel any scheduled hearing, except for a consolidated hearing on a cross-complaint pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J 315B; and (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (C) notify the parties in writing that the complaint has been marked settled. (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (c) Cross-complaints. (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (1) A withdrawal or settlement of the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to subdivision (a) or (b) shall not affect the right of the defendant to proceed with a cross-complaint filed pursuant to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 315A, unless it includes the cross-complaint. (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (2) The defendant may file a written notice of withdrawal of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (a). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). (3) The parties may file a written notice of settlement or stipulated judgment of the cross-complaint in the manner set forth in subdivision (b). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). Comment: A complaint filed pursuant to subdivision (a)(2) or (b)(1)(ii) is not a ‘‘reinstatement’’ of the underlying action and is subject to all prescribed fees and costs for filing and service of a complaint. Compare with Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 314E, which provides for reinstatement of the complaint under the limited circumstance of failure to make timely service. This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). This rule also applies to the withdrawal or settlement of a cross-complaint. Moreover, a cross-complaint will survive the withdrawal or settlement of the corresponding complaint if it is not included in a notice filed pursuant to this rule. For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). For purposes of this rule, ‘‘stipulated judgment’’ means a judgment that is entered by the magisterial district court without a hearing and at the request of and with the agreement of the parties. See Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 210.1, prohibiting unauthorized ex parte communication with the magisterial district judge. The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). The provisions of prior Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 320, pertaining to continuances, were relocated to Pa.R.Civ.P.M.D.J. 209, effective July 1, 2005. Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052). Source The provisions of this Rule 320 adopted May 19, 2014, effective July 20, 2014, 44 Pa.B. 3310; amended December 1, 2025, effective April 1, 2026, 55 Pa.B. 8362. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (420051) to (420052).